Head-to-head, ranks 5 and 2 of 12
Legion Security vs Torq
The short answer
Legion Security totals 5.95 and Torq 6.50. Torq ranks higher by 0.55 points. The decisive criterion is integration transparency, where Legion Security scores 4 and Torq 8. Legion Security leads on 2 criteria, Torq on 2.
Seven scores side by side
| Criterion | Weight | Legion Security | Torq |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use-case breadth | 20% | 7 | 7 |
| Context grounding | 15% | 8 | 7 |
| Autonomy controls | 15% | 8 | 8 |
| Published evidence | 15% | 5 | 3 |
| Integration transparency | 15% | 4 | 8 |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | 2 | 2 |
| Momentum and recognition | 10% | 6 | 10 |
| Weighted total | 100% | 5.95 | 6.50 |
Where Legion Security is ahead
- Context grounding, 8 against 7. Learns workflows and tribal knowledge from past cases and from browser recordings of analyst investigations.
- Published evidence, 5 against 3. Five figures, all grade C, but two carry named customer sources (WELL Health, The University of Tulsa).
Where Torq is ahead
- Integration transparency, 8 against 4. A large public catalog; the first screen alone runs from 1Password to Check Point, though no total is stated.
- Momentum and recognition, 10 against 6. 140M USD Series D at 1.2B USD (2026-01-12), the Jit acquisition, and an IDC MarketScape Leader placement (2026-10-20, per Torq).
Verdict by situation
- Lean SOC: For a lean SOC, Torq leads 6.55 to 5.70, mostly on integration transparency (8 against 4); Legion Security only makes sense if that criterion matters little to you.
- Enterprise SOC with SOAR already: For an enterprise SOC that already runs SOAR, Torq leads 6.90 to 6.30, mostly on integration transparency (8 against 4); Legion Security only makes sense if that criterion matters little to you.
- Microsoft estate: For a Microsoft-centred estate, Torq leads 5.90 to 5.65, mostly on integration transparency (8 against 4); Legion Security only makes sense if that criterion matters little to you.
- Regulated and audited: For a regulated or audited organisation, Legion Security leads 5.90 to 5.80, mostly on published evidence (5 against 3); Torq only makes sense if that criterion matters little to you.
- MSSP: For an MSSP, Torq leads 6.65 to 5.80, mostly on integration transparency (8 against 4); Legion Security only makes sense if that criterion matters little to you.
The sourced difference on integration transparency
Legion Security, per legionsecurity.ai: Claims it works with all tools 'with or without APIs' and 'zero integrations for all your tools and processes' (learning from the browser). No connector catalog or count published on the pages read.
Torq, per torq.io: Large catalog (first screen alone: 1Password, Abnormal, AbuseIPDB, Anthropic Claude, Anvilogic, ANY.RUN, Apiiro, Aqua, Armis, Asana, Astrix, Jira, AWS, AWS Security Lake, Axonius, BambooHR, BigID, Box, Brinqa, Britive, Carbon Black, Check Point); no count stated on the page.
Both read between 2026-11-03 and 2026-11-05. Vendor statements are vendor claims.